Disposed

Thiru.T.Vadivel, M/Aged About v. the State Rep by

Madras HC10 Sept 2019HCP/1870/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This habeas corpus petition was filed to produce the petitioner's wife. The police appeared and stated it likely involves voluntary departure due to domestic discord. The court closed the petition, directing police investigation and production before a Magistrate if detained.

What did the court decide?

Habeas Corpus petition was closed. Investigation was directed with an instruction to produce the detenue before a jurisdictional Magistrate if secured.

Thiru.T.Vadivel, M/Aged About Vs the State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 10.09.2019

¶3

Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN

¶4

H.C.P. No. 1870 of 2018

¶5

T.Vadivel ... Petitioner -vs1.The State rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2.The Inspector of Police, Mathur Police Station, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person and body of the petitioner's wife Geetha, aged about 22 years before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondents :^{Mr.R.Prathap Kumar} Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER [Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] Seeking a direction to the respondents to produce the person and body of the petitioner's wife Geetha, aged about 22 years before this Court and set her at liberty, the present habeas corpus petition has been filed.

¶6

2.The petitioner is the husband of the detenue, who is stated to have left the matrimonial home along with her certificates, jewels and ATM Card.

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

3.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that prima facie it appears to be a case of voluntarily leaving the matrimonial home due to the discord between the petitioner and the detenue. The occurence happened in the year 2018.

¶9

In such view of the matter, we are not inclined to keep this petition pending any longer and the Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed. However, the respondent/police shall proceed with the investigation. As and when the detenue is secured, she should be produced before the jurisdictional Magistrate.

¶10

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)

¶11

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mmi/ssm
To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Mathur Police Station,
Krishnagiri District.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
H.C.P. No.1870 of 2018
RSI(CO)
CB(01/11/2019)

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Thiru.T.Vadivel, M/Aged About v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thiru.T.Vadivel, M/Aged About v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Pappathi, F/70 Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan, Vs the Superintendent of

Mr.K.v.Shanil Kumar, M/42 Vs the State Rep by

S.Karpagam, Vs the State Rep by Its

Vedhanayagam Paul Theodre, Vs the State Rep by Its

M.Kumar, Vs State Rep by Its