Uma v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a Habeas Corpus petition regarding her missing daughter. Detenue was produced, stated she married a man and wishes to return to parents. Court closed the petition as no further orders were necessary.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :04.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
H.C.P.No.179 of 2019
Uma .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.State, rep. by
The Inspector of Police
Town Police Station
Arakkonam.
2.Mohan .. Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus to produce the petitioner's daughter viz., Archana, aged 20 years, D/o.Ashok Kumar before this Court and set her at liberty.
For Petitioner .. Mr.A.P.Sathyamurthy For Respondents.. Mr.C.Iyyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor [R1 ] ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J)
This matter is not listed today and by way of mentioning, it is taken up for hearing today, for the reason that the detenue is produced before the Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus regarding the location and liberty of the petitioner's missing daughter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Uma
- respondent
State rep. by The Inspector of Police Town Police Station Arakkonam
- respondent
Mohan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court