Dismissed

A.Abdulmannan v. Stste of Tamilnadu

Madras HC8 Jul 2019HCP/176/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court heard a Habeas Corpus petition seeking premature release of the petitioner's father, a life convict on medical grounds. The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the authorities had already issued an order permitting the release.

What did the court decide?

Premature release of the petitioner's father on medical grounds was denied as the relief had become infructuous due to a prior government order.

A.Abdulmannan Vs Stste of Tamilnadu — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 08..07..2019 CORAM

¶2

The Honourable Mr Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Honourable Mr Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR Habeas Corpus Petition No.176 of 2019

A.Abdulmannan

... Petitioner

-Versus-

1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Home Prohibition and Excise Department, St. George Fort,

¶7

Secretariat, Chennai 600009.

¶8

2.The Additional Director General of Police and Inspector General of Prison, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600008.

¶9

3.The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

¶10

4.The Superintendent of Prison, Coimbatore Central Prison, Coimbatore.

¶11

... Respondents

¶12

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the petitioner's father - Bilal Haijiar @ A.Abdul Hameed (Life Convict NO.3242), aged about 86 years, who has been confined in Central Prison Coimbatore and at present taking treatment Royal Care Medical Center Hospital, Coimbatore, before this court and release him prematurely on medical grounds.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ponraj For Respondents : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj, APP for RR1 to 4

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

ORDER

¶16

[Order of the court was made by Justice M.M.SUNDRESH]

¶17

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the in view of the order passed in G.O.(D) No.596, Home (Prison-IV) Department, dated 13.06.2019, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and the relief sought for has become infructuous.

¶18

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶19

-s/d-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)

¶21

True Copy

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶23

kmk To

¶24

1.The Secretary to Government, Home Prohibition and Excise Department,

¶25

St. George Fort,

¶26

Secretariat, Chennai 600009.

¶27

2.The Additional Director General of Police and Inspector General of Prison,

¶28

Gandhi Irwin Road,

¶29

Egmore, Chennai 600008.

¶30

3.The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

¶31

4.The Superintendent of Prison, Coimbatore Central Prison, Coimbatore.

¶32

5.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras 104

¶33

H.C.P.No. 176 of 2019

¶34

MP(CO) SP(05/08/2019)

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Abdulmannan v. Stste of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Abdulmannan v. Stste of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parthiban, Aged 29 Years Vs State by

S.Kavitha, Aged 22 Years, Vs the State Rep . by

U.Indira Vs the State Rep. by

A.Annesha Banu Vs the State Represented by Its

Najeena Vs the Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu

K.Noorjahan Vs the State Represented by Its