S.Kavitha, Aged 22 Years, v. the State Rep . by
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Habeas Corpus petition filed by a wife to produce her detained husband, the court found the detenu could not be secured. It closed the petition but directed investigation to continue and production before a Magistrate when secured.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed; direction to continue investigation and produce detenu before Magistrate when secured.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05..07..2019 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
HABEAS CORPUS PETITION NO.2366 OF 2019
S.Kavitha ... Petitioner
-Versus1. The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, North Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District.
- The Superintendent of Police, Vellore District. 3. R.Subramani 4. S.Rajesjwari ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the body of the petitioner's husband namely, Mr.Sekar (Detenu), aged 27 years, before this court and set him at liberty.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravindhar For Respondents : Mr.R.Prathap Kumar, APP for RR1 and 2
ORDER
[Order of the court was made by Justice M.M.SUNDRESH]
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to produce the petitioner's husband who could not be secured despite efforts.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Kavitha
- respondent
The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, North Police Station, Vellore
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Vellore District
- respondent
R.Subramani
- respondent
S.Rajesjwari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court