A.Loganathan v. D.Shanthi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a civil suit filed for specific performance as settled out of court upon receipt of Rs.25,00,000/- by the plaintiff from the defendant.
What did the court decide?
Court fee paid by plaintiff directed to be refunded.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.S.No.636 of 2015
A.Loganathan ... Plaintiff
Vs.
D.Shanthi ... Defendant
Prayer:- The Civil Suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil
Procedure read with Order IV Rule 1 of the High Court Original Side Rules
and Section 10 & 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
For Plaintiff : Mr.M.Vaidyanathan
For defendant : Mr.K.V.Babu
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the plaintiff made an endorsement giving up the claim over the suit property on receipt of a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- from the defendant by way of Demand Draft of Rs.25,00,000/- which has been handed over to the learned counsel for the defendant to the learned counsel for the plaintiff.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Loganathan
- respondent
D.Shanthi
Coram
R.SUBRAMANIAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court