The Single Judge held that releasing rights in ancestral property does not disqualify a sister from claiming a share as a Class 2 heir in the estate of her deceased brother, allowing her impleadment as a necessary party.
Impleadment of the applicant as 9th defendant in the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
A.No. 2882 of 2019 in C.S.No. 799 of 2018
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
Admittedly, the applicant is the sister of the deceased S.Kothandam,
whose estate is sought to be partitioned in the suit.
2
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
kkn
party to the suit. Hence, this application is allowed impleading the applicant as
9th defendant in the suit. Counsel for the plaintiffs to carry out the amendment
by 30.04.2019 and file amended copy of the plaint.
10.04.2019
kkn
A.No. 2882 of 2019
in
C.S.No. 799 of 2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a sister who released her rights in ancestral property is entitled to claim a share as a Class 2 heir after her brother's death and subsequent partition among the brother's heirs.
Sister of the deceased S.Kothandam
Plaintiffs
R.SUBRAMANIAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
