Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 CPC to set aside an order. No appearance by the petitioner. The petition was dismissed for default as no representation was provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISHKUMAR
C.R.P.No.1302 of 2009
and
M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2009
Seerapathy Kounder ... Petitioner/ 1st Defendant Vs 1.Kalidoss Kounder 2.Ranganatha Kounder 3.Mannangatti Kounder ... Respondents/Plaintiffs/ Defendants 2 to 3 PRAYER:
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code praying to set aside the order dated 03.11.2008 in E.P.No.129 of 2007 in O.S.No.558 of 1995 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents: Mr.N.P.Kumar for R1. Not ready in notice – R2. No appearance – R3.
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 03.11.2008 in E.P.No.129 of 2007 in O.S.No.558 of 1995 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam.
2.When the matter came up before this Court on 25.02.2019, the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner sought time and the matter was adjourned today. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the revision petitioner.
3.Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ay
To
The Principal District Munsif,
Tindivanam.
C.R.P.No.1302 of 2009
and
M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2009
CS/15/05/2019
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Seerapathy Kounder
1. Kalidoss Kounder
2. Ranganatha Kounder
3. Mannangatti Kounder
N. Sathishkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
