M/S. Madan & Co. v. Taraben N Doshi
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petitions were dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear when the matter was listed for hearing on 22.08.2019 and again on 27.08.2019.
Civil Revision Petitions were dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear when the matter was listed for hearing on 22.08.2019 and again on 27.08.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.08.2019 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CRP.NPD.Nos.1010 to 1012 of 2002 and CMP.Nos.10790 to 10792 of 2002
M/s.Madan & Co., Rep. by its Proprietor, Mr.Mandanchand Darda 61, Moore Street, Chennai - 600 001.
... Petitioner in all CRPs
vs.
1.Taraben N.Doshi
2.Asha N.Doshi
3.Mukesh N.Doshi
...Respondents 1 to 3 in all CRPs
4.M/s.Motor Industries Co. Ltd.,
Represented by its
Managing Director,
Post Box No.3000,
Hosur Road, Adugodi,
Bangalore – 560 030.
... 4 th Respondent in
CRP.NPD.No.1010 of 2002
4.M/s.National Peroxide Ltd.,
Represented by its Director,
Neville House,
J.N.Heredia Marg,
Ballard Estate,
Mumbai - 400 038.
...4 th Respondent in
CRP.NPD.No.1011 of 2002
4.M/s.Nelco Chemicals India Ltd.,
Represented by its
Managing Director,
20-A, Park Street,
Calcutta - 700 016.
... 4 th Respondent in
CRP.NPD.No.1012 of 2002
COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the common order dated
18.07.2002 passed in EP.Nos.9, 10 & 11 of 1999 in OP.Nos.187, 186 & 215 of 1993 on the file of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai - 4.
When these Civil Revision Petitions came up for hearing on 22.08.2019, there was no representation for the revision petitioner and hence was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 26.08.2019. Even today, i.e., 27.08.2019 there is no representation for the revision petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 is present. 2. In view of the same, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Registrar, The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai – 4 2. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court, Madras +1cc to Mr.P.Sukumar, Advocate sr.73615 CRP.NPD.Nos.1010 to 1012 of 2002 and CMP.Nos.10790 to 10792 of 2002 nrl(co) nr 14/10/2019
M/s. Madan & Co.
Taraben N. Doshi
Asha N. Doshi
Mukesh N. Doshi
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court