Dismissed

Tmt.Kuppammal v. Subbanna Gonder (Died)

Madras HC22 Aug 2019CRP/2420/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge dismissed a civil revision petition filed by a defendant challenging an interlocutory order allowing the admission of additional documents at the appellate stage, holding that since a second appeal was pending, there was no question left for adjudication in the revision. The petition was disposed of without costs. No costs.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed; no costs.

Tmt.Kuppammal Vs Subbanna Gonder (Died) — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

CRP.NPD.No.2420 of 2010

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 22.08.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
CRP.NPD.No.2420 of 2010
Kuppammal ... Petitioner
vs.
Subbanna Gounder(died)
1.Palani Gounder
2.S.Subramaniam
3.Kamalathal
4.Palanisamy
5.Velusamy
6.K.Chinnammal
7.K.Rajendra Kumar
8.K.Shanmugasundaram
9.K.Manonmani
10.Krishnasamy
11.Kumarasamy Gounder
12.Marappan
13.Kanniammal
14.Rasathal
15.S.C.Muthusamy Mudaliar
1/4

¶6

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶7

CRP.NPD.No.2420 of 2010

¶8

16.Balasubramaniam
17.Deivasigamani
18.Arumugam
19.S.Rangasamy
20.Ramaswami
21.Duraisamy
22.Ponni
23.M.Rangasamy
24.Yamunadevi ...Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil
Procedure against the fair and decreetal orders dated 11.12.2008 in
IA.No.1659 of 2008 in AS.No.154 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District
Judge, Coimbatore.

¶9

For Petitioner : Ms.R.Divyapreathika
For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Baskaran for R1 to R9
No appearance for R10 to R24
O R D E R

¶10

The present revision petition is filed challenging the orders passed in IA.No.1659 of 2008 in AS.No.154 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore. The said Interlocutory Application was filed to receive additional documents at the appellate stage.

¶11

2/4

¶12

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶13

CRP.NPD.No.2420 of 2010

¶14

The learned Principal District Judge, Coimbatore after analysing

¶15

the evidence on record, allowed the petition and marked the additional documents as Ex.B25 to Ex.B28 vide his fair and decreetal orders dated 11.12.2008. Aggrieved over the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is

¶16

filed.

¶17

Mr.T.S.Baskaran, learned counsel appearing for the respondents

¶18

1 to 9 contended that the First Appeal in AS.No.154 of 2004 was disposed of

¶19

by the learned Principal District Judge, Coimbatore and a Second Appeal in

¶20

SA.No.1048 of 2010 was also filed before this Court.

¶21

Since the present Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the orders passed in IA.No.1659 of 2008 in AS.No.154 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore, nothing survives for further adjudication. Therefore, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.

22.08.2019

mbi

Index : Yes/No

3/4

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶27

CRP.NPD.No.2420 of 2010

R.HEMALATHA, J.

mbi

The Principal District Judge, Coimbatore.

¶32

CRP.NPD.No.2420 of 2010

¶33

22.08.2019

¶34

4/4

¶35

http://www.judis.nic.in

Tmt.Kuppammal v. Subbanna Gonder (Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tmt.Kuppammal v. Subbanna Gonder (Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Krishnan, Vs Thangapandi Thevar

Mr. T. Raghu Vs Shiram Chits Tamilnadu

Gurunathan Mudaliar(Died) Vs Sampath

The Commissioner Vs R. Gunasekaran

Dhanalakshmi Vs Arulmani

Shriram Chits & Investments Vs a.S.Mani