Vethambal v. Amirthalingam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court ordered the abatement of the Civil Revision Petition due to the death of a respondent and lack of cooperation from the petitioner. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition was abated; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD) No.922 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.12.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD) No.922 of 2011 and M.P(MD) No.1 of 2011
Vethambal ... Petitioner/3rd Respondent/Nil
-Vs-
1.Amirthalingam 2.Dhanapackiyam ... Respondents 1 & 2/Petitioners 1 & 2/ Defendants 2 & 3 3.Vaidyalingam ... 3rd Respondent/1st Respondent/Plaintiff 4.Appakannu (died) ... 4th Respondent/2nd Respondent/ 1st Defendant 5.A.Kabilan 6.Thenmozhi ... 5th & 6th Respondents/ 4th & 5th Respondents/Nil
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in E.P.No.24 of 2009 in O.S.No.192 of 1993 on the file of the Sub Court, Pattukottai, dated 17.02.2011 by allowing this Civil Revision Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vethambal
- respondent
Amirthalingam
- respondent
Dhanapackiyam
- respondent
Vaidyalingam
- respondent
Appakannu
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court