Baskar, v. Kumaran
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the underlying suit had been disposed of, relying on the representation by learned counsel for the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous with no costs and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD)(MD) No.2256 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.12.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.R.P.(PD)(MD) No.2256 of 2013 and M.P(MD) No.1 of 2013
Baskar
... Petitioner
-Vs-
1.Kumaran
2.The Sub-Registrar No.1 Kumbakonam Office, Sub-Registrar's Office, Cutchery Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.40 of 2012 in O.S.No.26 of 2010 dated 11.02.2013 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Baskar
- respondent
Kumaran
- respondent
The Sub-Registrar No.1 Kumbakonam Office
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court