Allowed

S.Gurushankar, v. Al.Periyakaruppan

Madras HC16 Apr 2019CRP(MD)/702/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of the Madras High Court granted an extension of two months to the District Munsif Court, Melur for disposing of an inter-application (IA No.792 of 2012) arising in an original suit, accepting the District Munsif's request and assigned reasons.

What did the court decide?

Extension of two months granted for disposal of IA No.792 of 2012 in O.S. No.412 of 2004 from the date of receipt of the order.

S.Gurushankar, Vs Al.Periyakaruppan — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

CRP(MD). No.702 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶4

Friday, the Twelfth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty One

¶5

PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice P.T.ASHA CRP(MD)No.702 of 2019 Dr.S.Gurushankar ... Petitioner/9^th Respondent

¶6

Vs 1.Al.Periyakaruppan 2.Nagammal Anandhi 3.P.Selvam Alagappan ... Respondents/Petitioners/ Plaintiffs

¶7

V.N.Chidambaram Chettiar (Died) 4.Ct.Nagammal Achi 5.Ranee Valliappan @ Lakshmi 6.C.Nagappan 7.C.Ganesh 8.M.S.Navaneethakrishnamaraja 9.V.Kathiresan 10.C.Valliappan ... Respondent/Respondent/ Defendants

¶8

Prayer :- This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the District Munsif Court, Melur to dispose the IA.No.792 of 2012 in OS.No.412 of 2004 within the time span as fixed by this Honourable Court.

¶9

ORDER:- This Civil Revision Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the earlier order of this Court dt.16.04.2019, 11.03.2020, 09.07.2020, 01.04.2021 and 20.07.2021 and the requisition letter submitted by the District Munsif, Melur, in D.No.491 of 2021 dated 21.10.2021 and this Court made the following order:-

¶10

This matter is listed today under the caption 'for extension of time' on the letter received from the learned District Munsif, Melur, seeking extension of two months time to dispose of the petition in I.A.No.792 of 2012 in O.S.No.412 of 2004.

¶11

2.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the reasons assigned by the learned District Munsif, Melur, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court is inclined to extend the time as requested by the llearned

¶12

1/2

¶13

CRP(MD). No.702 of 2019

¶14

District Munsif, Melur, by two months and accordingly, it is extended by two months from the date of receipt of communication of this order from the Registry.

¶15

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶16

// True Copy //

¶17

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶18

¶19

¶20

The District Munsif, Melur.

¶21

Copy to:

¶22

The Section Officer, Judicial Section,

¶23

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶24

ORDER DATED : 12/11/2021 ========================== ORDER ========================== CRP(MD).No.702 of 2019

¶25

RK/SKN(24/11/2021) 2P 3C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

2/2

S.Gurushankar, v. Al.Periyakaruppan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Gurushankar, v. Al.Periyakaruppan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Athima Munivar Samuthaya Trust Vs Stara

R.Backialakshmi Vs K.Pandian

P.Saratha Vs K.Sosasundaram (Died)

M.Krishnamoorthy, Vs R.Sudha Maheswari,W/O.Raja

Anbu Traders, Vs M/S.P.J.T.P.Corporation, Rep.

R.Vasantha Vs Maheswari