Mani v. Suriyakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
This order holds a Civil Revision Petition infructuous because the underlying suit was dismissed while the petition was pending. The matter was disposed of with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD)(MD) No.2428 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.12.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD) No.2428 of 2011 and M.P(MD) No.1 of 2011
Mani
... Petitioner/ Defendant
1.Suriyakumar 2.Balamurugan
... Respondents/ Plaintiffs
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order and decreetal order passed by the Principal District Munsif, Karur in I.A.No.184 of 2011 in O.S.No.985 of 2005, dated 01.06.2011.
Challenge in this Civil Revision Petition is to an order allowing the application for amendment made in I.A.No.184 of 2011 in O.S.No.985 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Karur. It is now stated that pending above Civil Revision Petition, the suit itself came to be dismissed on 10.06.2016. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petition. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mani
- respondent
1. Suriyakumar 2. Balamurugan
Coram
R. Subramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court