Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Kandasamy Vs Pappayee(Died) — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

Home
Madras HC
2019
Kandasamy Vs Pappayee(Died)Kandasamy v. Pappayee(Died)

Disposed

Kandasamy v. Pappayee(Died)

Madras HC12 Dec 2019CRP(MD)/18/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the civil revision petition abated due to the death of the petitioner and lack of instructions from legal representatives.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.18 of 2010

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.12.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.18 of 2010

Kandasamy

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.Pappayee (died)*

2.Karuppayee

3.Vadamalai *

4.Indirani *

Respondents 3 and 4 are brought on record as

legal representatives of deceased 1st respondent

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Kandasamy
respondent
Pappayee
respondent
Karuppayee
respondent
Vadamalai
respondent
Indirani

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 12 Dec 2019 · December
Registered: 5 Jan 2010
Case no.: CRP(MD)/18/2010

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R. Subramanian

A.Nallusamy Vs M.Gurunathan
11 Dec 2019
Rajammal Vs Kasinathan
11 Dec 2019
Masanammal Vs C. Maheskarthick
11 Dec 2019
Habeeb Beham Vs v.Soosai Raj
12 Dec 2019
Halima Bibi Vs Sheik Dawood

Cite this judgement

Kandasamy v. Pappayee(Died), CRP(MD)/18/2010 (MAD), decided on 12 December 2019.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R.Subramanian

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Disposed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The revision petition was disposed of with abatement in consequence of the petitioner's death. No costs were awarded. No substantive legal issue was determined.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

vide Court order dated 19.06.2019 made in

MP(MD)No.243 of 2012 in CRP(MD)No.18/2010.

... Respondents

PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 30.09.2009 made in I.A.No.461 of 2008 in O.S.No.460 of 1995 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Karur.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govindarajan For R1 : died For R2 : Mr.M.P.Senthil For R3 & R4 : No Appearance

ORDER

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner stated that the petitioner died long back. It is further stated that he has no instructions from the legal representatives of the petitioner. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as having abated. No costs.

Assistant Registrar ()

// True Copy //

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

rm

To

The Principal Sub Court, Karur.

C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.18 of 2010 12.12.2019

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ KM/(02.01.2020) 1P 2C

1/1

Coram

AI extract

R.Subramanian

CNR

HCMD010009452010

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

DISPOSED OF

12 Dec 2019

Subramanian Chettiyar Vs Hasan

12 Dec 2019