A civil revision petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying suit in the original number had already been disposed of by the trial court.
Civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)No.2078 of 2013(PD)
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.12.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN C.R.P.(MD)No.2078 of 2013(PD) and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014
M.Pakkeer .. Petitioner/Respondent/Defendant
vs.
P.Sahul Hamdeed .. Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the Fair and Decretal Order dated 03.10.2013 passed in C.M.A.No.6 of 2013 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil reversing the Fair and Decretal Order dated 22.01.2013 in I.A.No.260 of 2012 in O.S.No.335 of 2012, on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandy by allowing this Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Nallathambi For Respondent : Mr.E.V.N.Siva
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order in C.M.A.No.6 of 2013, dated 03.10.2013 in and by which the order of the trial court vacating the interim injunction granted pending suit was reversed in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
Assistant Registrar (AD-II)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
1/2
C.R.P.(MD)No.2078 of 2013(PD)
To
02.12.2019
SMA/16/12/19/2P/4C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition is maintainable when the underlying suit has been disposed of.
M. Pakkeer
P. Sahul Hamdeed
R. Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
