R.Palanisamy v. P.Sridar
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a decree confirming a compromise settlement in a suit for specific performance. The court dismissed the appeal and passed a decree in terms of the memorandum of compromise between parties.
What did the court decide?
Decree passed in O.S.No.467 of 2010 in terms of the memorandum of compromise; appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
S.A.No.443 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
1.R.Palanisamy
2.Minnalkodi
P.Sridar
...Appellants/Appellants/Defendants
Vs.
...Respondent /Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 30.07.2013 in A.S.No.3 of 2013 on the file of II Additional Sub Court, Salem confirming the judgment and decree dated 03.08.2010 in O.S.No.467 of 2010, II Additional District Munsif Judge, Salem.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed against the decree confirming the compromise settlement in a suit for specific performance should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.Palanisamy
- appellant
Minnalkodi
- appellant
P.Sridar
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court