Revision petition seeking to set aside eviction order. Petitioner asserted possession was handed over, rendering prayer infructuous. Court dismissed petition as infructuous and closed connected miscellaneous petition.
The revision petition was dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petition was closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD) No.1924 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.K.Suresh ... Petitioner
vs.
G.Varadharajan ... Respondent
Prayer:- This Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam in I.A.No.103 of 2008 in UFRCA.No......... of 2008 dated 25.07.2013.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner/tenant has already handed over the possession of the property to the respondent/landlord and that the prayer sought for in this revision petition has now become infructuous.
2.In view of the above, nothing survives for further consideration in the present revision petition and accordingly, this Civil Revision petition is dismissed as infurctuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
To
The Principal Subordinate Judge,
Kumbakonam.
+1 CC to M/s.D.SELVANAYAGAM, Advocate ( SR-96870[F] dated 08/11/2019 mm
sma(26.11.2019) 1 P 3 C
1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.K.Suresh
G.Varadharajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
