E.Sarojini v. Essakkiraju
Case brief
What is this about?
In this civil miscellaneous second appeal under section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, the Madras High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the orders of the courts below with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Orders of both courts below set aside; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
CMSA(MD). No.34 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Tuesday, the Fifth day of November Two Thousand and Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon'ble Ms.Justice P.T.ASHA
CMSA(MD). No.34 of 2010
E.Sarojini, ...Appellant/Appellant/Respondent
Vs
Essakkiraju, ... Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner
Prayer :-
Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed under Order 41 Rule 1 read with section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decreetal order dated 09.12.2009 made in C.M.A.(HM).NO.13 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi, confirming the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2008 made in H.M.O.P.No.188 of 2007 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.
DECREE:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned judgment and decree under challenge should be allowed or dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
E.Sarojini
- respondent
Essakkiraju
Coram
P.T. ASHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court