Habeeb Beham v. Rajathi
Case brief
What is this about?
Two civil revision petitions under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960 were closed on the representation that tenants had vacated the property after fire, leaving rights for a suit.
What the court decided
CRP NPD(MD)Nos.1675 & 1676 of 2007
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
CRP NPD(MD)Nos.1675 & 1676 of 2007
Habeeb Beham Represented by her Power Agent and Husband A.John Mohamed
... Petitioner in both CRPs
Vs.
1.Rajathi ... Respondent in CRP.1675/07 2.A.Muthu ... Respondent in CRP.1676/07
COMMON PRAYER :This petition is filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960, against the judgment and decree dated 07.12.2005 made in R.C.A.Nos.5 and 6 of 2005, on the file of the Sub Court (Appellate Authority), Devakottai, confirming the Judgment and Decree, dated 17.01.2005 in R.C.O.P.Nos.15 and 14 of 2001 respectively on the file of District Munsif Court (Rent Controller), Karaikudi.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Habeeb Beham
- respondent
Rajathi
- respondent
A. Muthu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court