A.Ayyavoo v. P.Rajam
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition filed regarding tenancy dispute was dismissed as infructuous by single judge since petitioner's counsel confirmed matter became infructuous and endorsed accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Points requested in the application were dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD)No.1530 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 01.11.2019
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.1530 of 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012
A.Ayyavoo
... Petitioner/Appellant/Tenant
Vs.
1.P.Rajam
2.S.Nirmala
3.S.Shyam Kumar 4.Minor S.Sasidharan
... Respondents 1 to 4/ Respondents 1 to 4/ Landlords
[Minor 4th Respondent is represented by his mother and guardian – S.Nirmala.]
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Ayyavoo
- respondent
1. P. Rajam
- respondent
2. S. Nirmala
- respondent
3. S. Shyam Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court