Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act held infructuous by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Vaidyanathan due to respondent's endorsement. Petition dismissed.
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P(MD)No.1449 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 01.11.2019
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
C.R.P(MD)No.1449 of 2012
N.Dhanalakshmi Ammal ... Petitioner/ Appellant/Respondent
Vs.
1.P.Vallimayil 2.P.Umarani 3.P.Murugadoss ... Respondents 1 to 3/ Respondents 1 to 3/ Petitioners 2 to 4
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, as amended by Act 1 of 1980 against the order dated 27.04.2012 made in R.C.A.No.96 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Sub Court (Rent Control Appellate Authority), Madurai, in modifying the order dated 24.07.2006 made in R.C.O.P.No.39 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif (The Rent Controller, Madurai Taluk), Madurai.
For Respondents : Mr.D.Nallathambi * * * * * ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the matter has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this civil revision petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Assistant Registrar
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )
rsb
1/2
C.R.P(MD)No.1449 of 2012
To
C.R.P(MD)No.1449 of 2012
01.11.2019
CS(14.11.2019) 2P 3C
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Dhanalakshmi Ammal
P.Vallimayil
P.Umarani
P.Murugadoss
S. Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
