S.Arjunan v. P.Murugaiyan
Case brief
What is this about?
This court closed a Civil Revision Petition as abated because the sole petitioner died long before and no legal heirs were brought on record to continue the proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Closed the Civil Revision Petition and connected miscellaneous petition as abated due to death of petitioner without substitutes being brought on record.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.1391 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.10.2019 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.1391 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011
S.Arjunan
... Petitioner/Petitioner/Defendant
Vs.
P.Murugaiyan ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 06.01.2011 passed in I.A.No.996 of 2010 in O.S.No.700 of 2007 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Karur.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balaji For Respondent : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan
O R D E R
Despite the fact that though the sole petitioner died long back, no steps have been taken to bring on record his legal heirs. Consequently, this Civil Revision Petition is closed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Arjunan
- respondent
P.Murugaiyan
Coram
P.T.Asha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court