A single-judge bench allowed a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, holding that the matter had become infructuous and consequently closing the petition without costs.
Civil Revision Petition closed/matter deemed infructuous; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH C.R.P.(MD)No.1201 of 2012
N.Esakkimuthu : Petitioner/Plaintiff
Vs. L.Gnanasekar : Respondent/Defendant
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Sub-Court, Valliyoor, Thirunelveli District to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.53 of 2010 pending on its file expeditiously by allowing this civil revision petition.
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to direct the SubCourt, Valliyoor to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.53 of 2010.
2.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the matter itself has become infructuous.
3.Recording the same, this Civil Revision Petition is closed. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS-II) // True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
gns
To
1.The Sub Judge, Valliyoor. Thirunelveli District.
C.R.P.(MD)No.1201 of 2012 04.10.2019
db(CO) TR(23.10.2019) 1P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Esakkimuthu
L.Gnanasekar
N.Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
