Disposed

M.Vadivel v. R.Nallasamy

Madras HC4 Oct 2019CRP(MD)/1178/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition seeking further extension of time for the disposal of an underlying suit (O.S.No.110 of 2012). The court noted a prior order granting six months and allowed an additional six months extension for the trial court due to the COVID-19 lockdown.

What did the court decide?

Granted a further extension of six months for the trial court to dispose of O.S.No.110 of 2012.

M.Vadivel Vs R.Nallasamy — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

CRP(MD). No.1178 of 2012

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

(Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

¶4

Monday, the Seventeenth day of August Two Thousand and Twenty

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.SESHASAYEE

¶7

CRP(MD). No.1178 of 2012

¶8

1 M.Vadivel 2 V.Palaniammal ...Petitioners/Respondents 1 and 2/ Respondent 1 and 2

¶9

¶10

1 R.Nallusamy ...Respondent/Petitioner/Plaintiff

¶11

2 The District Collector, Karur District Karur.

¶12

3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate, Karur.

¶13

4 The Assistant Director, Geology & Mines Department Collectorate , Karur.

¶14

5 The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Aravakkuruchi.

¶15

...Respondents/Respondents 3 to 6/ Respondents 3 to 6

¶16

Prayer :-

¶17

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 24.02.2012 made in I.A.No.182 of 2012 in O.S.No.110 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Karur.

¶18

ORDER:- Civil Revision Petition coming upon for hearing on this day and upon perusing the earlier order of this Court dated 04.10.2019 and the requisition letter submitted by the District Judge, Karur vide the Letter in D.No.1775 of 2020/A1 dated 13.07.2020 and upon hearing of Mr.R.Vijayakumar, Advocate for the Petitioner, Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar, Advocate for Mr.V.Balaji, Advocate for the 1^st Respondent and of Mr.R.Sethuraman, Special Government Pleader on behalf of the Respondents 2 to 5, this Court made the following order:

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/2

¶21

CRP(MD). No.1178 of 2012

¶22

This petition has been listed today for extension of time for disposing O.S.No.110 of 2012.

¶23

2.This Court has already disposed of the Civil Revision Petition by order dated 04.10.2019, by directing the trial Court to dispose of O.S.No.110 of 2012 within a period of six months.

¶24

3.Now, the trial Court seeks further time for disposing the suit owing to Covid-19 lock-down.

¶25

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, further six months time is granted from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to the trial Court for disposal of O.S.No.110 of 2012. The learned Judge shall keep in mind the attitude of the parties and dispose of the case within the prescribed time.

¶26

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶27

// True Copy //

¶28

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶29

¶30

1 The District Judge, Karur

¶31

2 The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Aravakurichi Copy to : The Section Officer (Judicial Section), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. (For Information)

¶32

ORDER DATED : 17/08/2020 ========================== EXTENSION OF TIME ==========================

¶33

CRP(MD). No.1178 of 2012

¶34

Giving direction and etc. as stated within.

¶35

AP(25/08/2020) 2P 4C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

2/2

M.Vadivel v. R.Nallasamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Vadivel v. R.Nallasamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ponnambalam Vs Soundarapandian

R. Sivakumar Vs Muruganandam @ Kulandaivel

A. Periyasamy Vs P. Surendira Babu

U.Arumugam Vs Ramaiah Nadar

Yasothai Vs Senthamarai

N. Esakkimuthu Vs L. Gnanasekar