Lakshmanan v. v.Durai
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India holding it infructuous as the underlying suit for non-prosecution was dismissed by the subordinate court. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.10.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.No.893 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
Lakshmanan
rep by Power Agent Mohanarangam ..Petitioner/5th Defendant
Vs. 1.V.Durai ..1st Respondent/Plaintiff 2.Thangavelu 3.Vasudevan 4.Shanmugham 5.Pavayee ..Respondents 2 to 5/Defendants 2,3,4 & 6
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the petition and orders in I.A.No.97 of 2012 in O.S.No.146 of 1999 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Namakkal dated 22.02.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jagadish For Respondents : R1 & R4 – no appearance R2, R3 & R5 – given up
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition becomes infructuous when the underlying suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lakshmanan (rep. by Mohanarangam)
- respondent
V. Durai
- respondent
Thangavelu
- respondent
Vasudevan
- respondent
Shanmugham
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court