R.Suji v. G.Praveen Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a civil revision petition under Article 226, the court recorded the petitioner's withdrawal request via endorsement and dismissed the petition accordingly, also dismissing the connected miscellaneous petition with no costs.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
C.R.P.(PD)No.574 of 2019 and
C.M.P.No.3854 of 2019
R.Suji ... Petitioner/Respondent
Vs.
G.Praveen Kumar ... Respondent/Petitioner
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India praying to set aside the fair and decretal order passed in
I.A.No.428 of 2017 in H.M.O.P.No.439 of 2017 dated 14.12.2018 on
the file of the Sub Court at Tambaram.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sam Japa Singh
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw
the civil revision petition and he has also made an endorsement
to that effect.
2.Recording the aforesaid endorsement, the Civil Revision
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently,
connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CJ conf)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Sgl
To
The Subordinate Judge,
Tambaram.
1
+1cc to Mr.P.Sam Japa Singh, Advocate SR.86457
C.R.P.No.574 of 2019
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Suji
- respondent
G.Praveen Kumar
Coram
R.Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court