This one-line order dismisses a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 as infructuous due to a subsequent endorsement made by the lower court declaring the petition's subject matter concluded.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP (PD)No.4403 of 2014
R. Senthilkumar ... Petitioner
versus
1. Ranjitha Mary
2. State Bank of India,
rep. By its Branch Manager,
Ammapettai Branch,
Ammapettai,
Bhavani Taluk,
Erode District. ... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the Petition and Order dated 21.01.2004 made in I.A. No.509 of 2013 in O.S. No.204 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Bhavani.
For Petitioner : Ms.S.Umadevi
for Ms.Kamatchi ORDER
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that
the Civil Revision Petition has now become infructuous. She has also
2
vsi2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. Accordingly,
the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
08.07.2019
Index: Yes/ No
Internet: Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order
vsi2
To
The Sub Court, Bhavani.
CRP (PD)No.4403 of 2014
08.07.2019
R. Senthilkumar
Ranjitha Mary
State Bank of India, rep. By its Branch Manager, Ammapettai Branch
Abdul Quddose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
