This single-line order dismisses a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for default, noting the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP (PD)No.2893 of 2014
E. Thomas Henry Mathuranayakam ... Petitioner
Vs
1. V. Louis Jesuraja
2. N.V. Moorthy ... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the judgment and decree passed by the learned XIV Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai made in I.A. No.9369 of 2013 in O.S No.1017 of 2013, dated 17.04.2014.
For Petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
Today, the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”.
When the matter was called, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last occasion, i.e. on 02.07.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be
2
vsi2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the revision petition. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
05.07.2019
Index: Yes/ No
Internet: Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order
vsi2
To
The XIV Judge, City Civil Court,
Chennai.
CRP (PD)No.2893 of 2014
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition should be dismissed as the petitioner failed to appear.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
E. Thomas Henry Mathuranayakam
V. Louis Jesuraja
N.V. Moorthy
Abdul Qudhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
