This court dismissed two Civil Revision Petitions as infructuous because the underlying suit (OS.No.170 of 2010) had been disposed of on 09.12.2013. No costs was awarded and connected petitions were closed.
The Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous; no costs; connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP.PD.Nos.4140 & 4141 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
CRP.PD.Nos.4140 & 4141 of 2013
and
MP.Nos.1 & 1 of 2013
Kanagaraj ... Petitioner in both CRPs
vs.
1.Krishna Kiramani
2.Alli
3.Ravichandran
4.K.Kurmar
5.Mangayarkarasi
6.K.Anandan
7.K.Barani
8.K.Mahadevi ... Respondents in both CRPs
COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal orders dated 10.09.2013 passed in IA.Nos.112 of 2013 & 113 of 2013 in OS.No.170 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam.
1/4
CRP.PD.Nos.4140 & 4141 of 2013
For Petitioner : Ms.K.Santhoshkumari
(in both CRPs) for Mr.S.Saravanan
For Respondents : Mr.E.Kooteswaran for R1 (in both CRPs) No appearance for other respondents
C O M M O N O R D E R
T he Registry was directed to ascertain whether the suit in
OS.No.170 of 2010 is still pending on the file of the Additional Subordinate
Judge, Tindivanam. Accordingly, a communication was sent by the Registry to the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam and the learned Judge in response sent a letter dated 26.08.2019 to the Registry, stating that the suit in OS.No.170 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Subordinate
Judge, Tindivanam was disposed of on 09.12.2013.
2. The present Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the orders
passed in IA.Nos.112 of 2013 & 113 of 2013 in OS.No.170 of 2010 on the file
of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam. Since, the suit itself is
disposed of, nothing survives for further adjudication in the present Civil Revision Petitions.
2/4
CRP.PD.Nos.4140 & 4141 of 2013
3. In the facts and circumstances, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
28.08.2019
mbi
Index : Yes/No
To
The Additional Subordinate Judge,
Tindivanam.
3/4
CRP.PD.Nos.4140 & 4141 of 2013
R.HEMALATHA, J.
mbi
CRP.PD.Nos.4140 & 4141 of 2013
and
MP.Nos.1 & 1 of 2013
28.08.2019
4/4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Civil Revision Petitions maintainable when the underlying suit is already disposed of.
Whether to allow or dismiss Civil Revision Petitions against orders in a finalized suit.
Kanagaraj
Krishna Kiramani
Alli
Ravichandran
K. Kurmar
Mangayarkarasi
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
