High Court dismissed a civil revision petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or be represented before the court.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP (NPD)No.3878 of 2014
Vijay Vaswani ... Petitioner
Vs
Rani Residents Flat Owners Association,
Rep. By its President / Secretary,
No.155, Velachery Main Road,
Chennai – 600 073. ... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the fair and decreetal orders, dated 25.09.2014 made in I.A. No.190 of 2014 in O.S. No.258 of 2008 on the file of the Court of District Munsif, Tambaram.
For Petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
Today, the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”.
When the matter was called, there is no representation on the side of
the petitioner. Even on the last occasion, i.e. on 09.07.2019, there
was no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be
2
inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the revision petition. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
17.07.2019
Index: Yes/ No
Internet: Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order
vsi2
To
The District Munsif,
Tambaram.
3
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsi2
CRP (NPD)No.3878 of 2014
17.07.2019
Vijay Vaswani
Rani Residents Flat Owners Association
Abdul Quddose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
