K.Vellaisamy v. Valarmathi
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution. Despite prior request, the petitioner had not appointed counsel or shown interest in pursuing the matter.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP (PD)No.2768 of 2014
and
MP No.1 of 2014
K. Vellaisamy ... Petitioner
Vs
Valarmathi ... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order made in I.A. No.410 of 2012 in O.S. No.328 of 2011, dated 03.01.2014 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Alandur, Kanchipuram District.
For Petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today. It is represented by Mr.S. Vijayakumar, the erstwhile learned counsel for the petitioner that he had given change of vakalth to the petitioner long time back. Despite giving change of vakalth, till date, the petitioner has not appointed a new counsel and it can now be inferred
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Vellaisamy
- respondent
Valarmathi
Coram
Abdul Quddose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court