The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a civil revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for default due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP (PD) No.3816 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.08.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP (PD)No.3816 of 2014
K.Kullan @ Rajkambattan ... Petitioner
Vs
1. The District Collector
of Nilgiris, Ooty.
2. The District Revenue Officer of
Nilgiris, Ooty.
3. The Tahsildar,
Coonoor Taluk,
Coonoor.
4. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar
of Coonoor. ... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 28.8.2014 passed in I.A. No.181 of 2014 in O.S. No.47 of 2009 by the District Munsif, Coonoor and allow this civil revision.
For Petitioner : No appearance
1/2
CRP (PD) No.3816 of 2014
vsi2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
ORDER
Today, the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. When the matter was called, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on an earlier occasion, i.e. on 27.08.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the revision petition. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
28.08.2019
Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order vsi2 To The District Munsif, Coonoor.
CRP (PD)No.3816 of 2014
2/2
K.ullan @ Rajkambattan
The District Collector of Nilgiris, Ooty
The District Revenue Officer of Nilgiris, Ooty
Abdul Qudhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
