Sharada v. L.Moolchand
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition for default after counsel conceded that key parties on the record were deceased and no legal representatives had been brought in, indicating lack of interest in prosecution.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
CRP (NPD) No.3355 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.08.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP (NPD)No.3355 of 2014
and
MP No.1 of 2014
1. Sharada
2. R. Murali ... Petitioners
Vs
1. L. Moolchand
2. R. Manoharan
3. R. Ravikumar
4. R. Vijayaraj
5. R. Vasanthi ... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under section 115 of C.P.C. to set aside the Fair and final order passed in E.A. No.59 of 2014 in E.P. No.64 of 2009 in O.S. No.96 of 2008, dated 23.07.2014 on the file of the Sub Court of Nilgiris at Udhagamandalam by allowing the Present Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioners : Mr. Ma.P.Thangavel For Respondents : Mr.B.Ravi for R1
ORDER
1/3
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sharada
- petitioner
R. Murali
- respondent
L. Moolchand
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court