P.Ramasamy v. P.Palanisamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court, in revision petitions under Article 226 filed against a decreetal order, granted an interim stay for a period of one week pending the disposal of the main revision petitions.
What did the court decide?
Interim stay granted for a period of one week.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twentieth day of November Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR
CRP No.2351 of 2015
1 P.RAMASAMY [ PETITIONERS ] 2 R.MUTHU PILLAI
Vs
P.PALANISAMY [ RESPONDENT ]
Petitions under Article 227, constitution of India, filed against the Fair and Decreetal order dated 21.4.2015 made in IA.No.955 of 2014 in OS.No.253/2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif of Tiruchengode [ in CRP.PD.No.2351/2015 ] and;
(2)To stay all further proceedings in the suit OS No. 253/2010 on the file of the Prl DMC,Tiruchengode (in MP.1/2015) pending disposal of the above CRP(PD).2351/2015 respectively.
Order: These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions and the respective affidavits filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.SARVABHAUMAN ASSO, Advocate for the petitioner and of learned counsel appearing for the respondent, the court made the following order:-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an interim stay should be extended for a short period considering the matter pending disposal of the revision petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. RAMASAMY
- petitioner
R. MUTHU PILLAI
- respondent
P. PALANISAMY
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court