Mrs.Jeeva v. Mr.Karuppaiah
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition filed to set aside an order dismissing an application to implead. Petitioner failed to appear. Court dismissed the petition for default.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
What the court decided
CRP(PD).No.3215 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.12.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRP(PD).No.3215 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
Jeeva ...Petitioner
Versus
1.Karuppaiah
2.Gopal (Died)
3.Mannammal ...Respondents
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of CPC, to set aside the order dated 03.07.2013, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Tambaram, in unnumbered petition in IASR.No.9002/2012 in A.S.No.22 of 2009.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For R1 : Mr.V.S.Sivasundaram
For R3 : Dismissed vide
order dated 26.07.2017
J U D G M E N T
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 03.07.2013, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Tambaram, in unnumbered petition in IA.SR.No.9002/2012 in A.S.No.22 of 2009.
2 From the records, it is clear that the first respondent herein has filed a suit in O.S.No.3267 of 1997, before
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition should be allowed ex-parte in the absence of the petitioner's representation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jeeva
- respondent
Karuppaiah
- respondent
Gopal (Died)
- respondent
Mannammal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court