Civil Revision Petition filed to set aside an order was dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the counsel for the petitioners on multiple hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(NPD).No.1667 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.12.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRP(NPD).No.1667 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
1.K.Shanthi
2.E.Kesavan ...Petitioners/Landlady
Versus
1.K.Guru @ Gurumoorthy
2.K.Manjula ...Respondents/Tenants
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 as amended, to set aside the order passed in RCA.No.548 of 2011, dated 06.03.2014, on the file of the learned VIII Small Causes Judge, Chennai.
For Petitioners : No appearance For R1 : Dismissed vide order dated 26.07.2019 For R2 : Notice served No appearance
1/3
CRP(NPD).No.1667 of 2014
dua
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN., J.
J U D G M E N T
On a perusal of the docket order of this Court, it is clear
that when the matter was called on 09.12.2019, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and the matter was posted to 12.12.2019. Even today (13.12.2019), when the matter
was called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2 Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.
13.12.2019
dua
Speaking Order:Yes/No
To
The Subordinate Judge, Tambaram.
CRP(NPD).No.1667 of 2014
and
2/3
CRP(NPD).No.1667 of 2014
M.P.No.1 of 2014
3/3
K.Santhi
E.Kesavan
K.Guru @ Gurumoorthy
K.Manjula
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
