Subramani v. Palani
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed by a revision petitioner who failed to appear. The court held that the petitioner was seeking to overturn trial court findings and erase earlier admissions made by a co-respondent in the first appeal.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 03.04.2019
CORAM:
The HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N.SATHISHKUMAR
C.R.P(NPD).No. 3103 of 2012
Subrmani ...Petitioner
vs.
1.Palani
2.Manokaran
3.Maravathyammal ...Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decree passed by the learned Sub Judge, Vellore in I.A.No. 155/2011 in A.S.No. 22/2010 on 19.11.2011 by dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking to receive the additional written statement in O.S.No. 373 of 1998. The said order and decree passed by the learned Sub Judge, is liable to be set aside.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.N.Manoharan for R1 & R3
R2 - unserved
2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition seeking permission to file an additional written statement should be allowed when filed to evade trial court findings?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Subramani
- respondent
Palani
- respondent
Manokaran
- respondent
Maravathyammal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court