Kannan v. Varadammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order dismissing a Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the underlying matter was settled out of court and execution proceedings were terminated.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 26.03.2019
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.R.P.(NPD)No.2813 of 2012
and M.P.No.1 of 2012
Kannan .. Petitioner
versus
Varadammal .. Respondent
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the order dated 20.03.2012 made in I.A.No.291 of 2010 in A.S.No.7 of 2011 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Gandhi For Respondent : Mr.S.Krishnasamy
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated
20.03.2012 made in I.A.No.291 of 2010 in A.S.No.7 of 2011 on the file of the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kannan
- respondent
Varadammal
Coram
N.SATHISH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court