Indrani v. Savithiri
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment records the disposal of a civil revision petition. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 25.03.2019
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.R.P.(NPD)No.3665 of 2008
and M.P.No.1 of 2008
1.Indrani
2.Kolanji
3.Ilayaraja .. Petitioners
versus
1.Savithiri
2.Parameswari .. Respondents
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the order dated 27.02.2008 made in I.A.No.437 of 2007 in I.A.No.322 of 2002 in O.S.No.16 of 1995 on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Kattumannerkoil.
For Petitioners : Mr.D.Govinda Reddy
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated
27.02.2008 made in I.A.No.437 of 2007 in I.A.No.322 of 2002 in O.S.No.16 of
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition being declared infructuous warrants its dismissal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Indrani, Kolanji, Ilayaraja
- respondent
Savithiri, Parameswari
Coram
N. Sathish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court