The High Court at Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226/227 as infructuous because the underlying I.D.O.P. was already disposed of in 2015.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.11.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.No.2734 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
1.M.Jothy @ Mary Jothy
2.Minor Baby (unnamed) ... Petitioner
(Minor is rep by the 1 st petitioner
as natural guardian and mother)
Vs.
A.Muthu ... Respondent
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India against the judgment and decree dated 25.02.2013 made in
I.A.No.752 of 2012 in I.D.O.P.No.76 of 2010 on the file of the
Principal District Judge, Thiruvallur.
For Petitioners : Ms.A.Subadra for Ms.M.Malar
For Respondent : Not ready in notice
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the relief sought for in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous for the reason that the I.D.O.P.No.76 of 2010 itself was disposed of on 13.10.2015 and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
va
To
C.R.P.No.2734 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
SPD(CO) CS/02/12/2019
M.Jothy @ Mary Jothy
Minor Baby
A.Muthu
M. Duraismwamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
