Dismissed

E.Subramanian v. Desathi Balija Kula Kavarai

Madras HC14 Feb 2019CRP/2291/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed Civil Revision Petition seeking to dismiss a pending suit filed by a cooperative society. Court observed no merits in revision as parties bypassed lower court defenses. It directed Subordinate Court to conclude proceedings on merits within nine months and granted liberty to file written statement after condoning delay, noting suit status was outdated. No costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file written statement after condoning delay; Subordinate Court to conclude proceedings on merits within nine months of receipt of order copy.

E.Subramanian Vs Desathi Balija Kula Kavarai — Cooperative Societies | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 14.02.2019

¶4

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN

¶5

C.R.P. (PD) No. 2291 of 2014
and
M.P. No. 1 of 2014
1.E. Subramanian
2.G. Jayaraman
3.V. Anantharaman ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.Desathi Balija Kula Kavarai Sangam
Rep.by its Vice President
Sri.Dinesh Jaganathan
Office at Old No.118, New No.29
Kavarai Street, (N.S.K. Street)
Chengalpattu Town & Taluk
Kancheepuram District.
2.B.Seetharaman
3.T.J.Radhakrishnan
4.The District Registrar,
Office of the Registration of Societies,
Chengalpattu.
5.The Registrar of Societies,
Office of the Registration of Societies.
Chengalpattu. ... Respondents

¶6

PRAYER: Civil Revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the

¶7

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶8

¶9

Constitution of India, to dismiss the suit in O.S.No.58 of 2014, on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Chengalpattu.

¶10

For Petitioners : Mr. S. Sathia Chandran

¶11

For Respondents : Mr. A. Dev. Narendran

¶12

Government Advocate (CS) (for R4 & R5) O R D E R

¶13

The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed to dismiss

¶14

O.S.No.58 of 2014, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu.

¶15

The petitioners, who are the first to third defendants in O.S.No.58 of 2014, have alleged that the suit was filed by one

¶16

Dinesh Jeganathan, who is the Vice President of the respondent/Sangam. According to the petition the said suit was without jurisdiction. As per the bye-laws, only the Secretary was empowered to represent the first respondent/ Plaintiff Sangam.

¶17

Consequently, had prayed for dismissal of the suit.

¶18

It is further submitted that as per the bye-laws, the election

¶19

is only for a period of one year and that the issue relating to Form-7 was pending before the Registrar of Society.

¶20

It is noticed that the petitioners have straight away

¶21

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶22

¶23

approached this Court without filing application to reject the plaint or without filing written statement. I do not find any merits in the present Civil Revision Petition.

¶24

5.It is noticed that the suit is of the year 2014. The current status of the said suit has not been updated. If the suit has not been already disposed, liberty is given to the petitioners to file a formal application to condone the delay in filing written statement and file written statement. Under the circumstances, the Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu shall endeavour to bring a closure to the proceedings on merits within a period of nine months from

¶25

the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

6.The Civil Revision Petition thus stands dismissed with the

¶27

above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

14.02.2019

Index: Yes/No

jen

C. SARAVANAN, J.

http://www.judis.nic.in

jen

The Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu.

¶37

C.R.P. (PD) No. 2291 of 2014
and
M.P. No. 1 of 2014
14.02.2019

¶38

http://www.judis.nic.in

E.Subramanian v. Desathi Balija Kula Kavarai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E.Subramanian v. Desathi Balija Kula Kavarai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.J.Sarala Vs Mrs.B.v.Loganayaki

Elumalai Vs Vediayappan

Elumalai Vs Vediayappan

Arokiya Famila Vs G.Johnson

Dr.P.Sundarraj Vs a.S.Pandurangan Chettiar

Venkatesalu Vs Kondaiah