Arokiya Famila v. G.Johnson
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision petition filed to set aside a Family Court order was dismissed as infructuous because the children had attained majority during the petition's pendency.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.1261 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
Arokiya Famila ... Petitioner
Vs.
G.Johnson ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 12.02.2013 made in I.A.No.417 of 2010 in M.O.P.No.315 of 2008 on the file of the Family Court at Pondicherry.
For Petitioner : M/s. Mahadevi
For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that I.A.No.417 of 2010 was filed for visitation rights, which was dismissed on 12.02.2013. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the children have attained majority during the pendency of this Civil Revision Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arokiya Famila
- respondent
G. Johnson
Coram
C. Saravanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court