Bhuvaneshwari v. Rajammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Three civil revision petitions were dismissed as infructuous because the main suit had already been disposed of by the trial court.
What did the court decide?
No costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD)Nos.2034, 2035 & 2036 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
C.R.P.(PD)Nos.2034, 2035 & 2036 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.13183 of 2019
1.Bhuvaneshwari
2.Singaraj ... Petitioners in all CRPs
Vs.
Rajammal ... Respondent in all CRPs
Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the orders passed in I.A.Nos.7, 5 & 6 of 2019 in O.S.No.72 of 2012 dated 28.03.2019 on the file of the Additional Sub Judge, Namakkal.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Kalyanaraman
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in all the three
revision petitions has made a submission that, these revision petitions have become infructuous, as the main suit has already been disposed of by the trial Court and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bhuvaneshwari
- petitioner
Singaraj
- respondent
Rajammal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court