The Single Judge condoned the petitioner's delay of 823 days in paying the deficit court fee for a Civil Revision Petition, allowing the proceedings to continue.
The delay of 823 days in paying the deficit court fee of Rs.300/- was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.10991 of 2019 in C.R.P.SR.No.95099 of 2016
C.M.P.No.10991 of 2019 in C.R.P.SR.No.95099 of 2016
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
This is a petition to condone the delay of 823 days in paying the deficit Court fee of Rs.300/- in C.R.P.SR.No.95099 of 2016.
2.Heard Mr.P.S.Kothandaraman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Valliappan, learned counsel for the respondents.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, the
CRP case papers were returned for rectification of certain mistakes and having rectified the same, it was represented twice and in the meanwhile, Court Fee Act was subjected to amendment and therefore,
after having taken note of the same, the deficit Court fee ought to have been paid and in the meanwhile, the bundle has been misplaced
in the office of the counsel for the petitioner, altogether, therefore, there had been a delay in making the deficit Court fee.
C.M.P.No.10991 of 2019 in C.R.P.SR.No.95099 of 2016
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
Sgl
4.He further submits that, the other defects since had been
rectified and the representation was allowed, unless this delay in
paying the deficit Court fee is allowed, the petitioner would be put to
hardship, as by thus the main Civil Revision Petition itself would get
defeated.
5.Considering the said aspects, this petition is ordered and the
delay is condoned.
30.10.2019
Sgl
C.M.P.No.10991 of 2019 in
C.R.P.SR.No.95099 of 2016
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 823 days in condoning the payment of deficit court fee should be condoned.
Petitioner
Respondents
R SURESH KUMAR J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
