Subramani v. Kaliappan
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition for not pressing, where counsel made an untruthful endorsement regarding the pleadings. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as not pressed; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.3011 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.11.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.No.3011 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
Venkatachalam ... Petitioner Vs. Bangaru @ Ramayal ... Respondent
Petition filed under Article227 of the Constitution of India against the judgment and decree dated 20.06.2013 in I.A.No.964 of 2012 in O.S.No.393 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Gobichettipalayam.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Rajendran for M/s.P.R.Balasubramanian For Respondent : not ready in notice
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made an
endorsement not pressing the Civil Revision Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Venkatachalam
- respondent
Bangaru @ Ramayal
Coram
M. Duraismamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court