Annamalai v. Vetrivel
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 against an order in proceedings filed in Salem. Petitioners sought withdrawal of the Petition, which was granted. The Petition and connected miscellaneous petition were dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petition dismissed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.10.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR
C.R.P.No.1331 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.7472 of 2016
1.Annamalai
2.Balakrishnan
3.Shanmugham
4.Mahdeswaran
5.Rajamanickam
6.Surruttaiyan
7.Mandhiri
9.Natesan ... Petitioners
-Vs-
Vetrivel ... Respondent
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the the fair and decreetal order dated 03.03.2016 in REP No.451 of 2013 in OS No.491 of 2001 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Salem.
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the above Civil Revision Petition and has made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Sub Assistant Registrar
KST To
The Principal District Munsif, Salem +1cc to Mr.R.Selva Kumar ,Advocate SR.No. 88527
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Annamalai and Others
- respondent
Vetrivel
Coram
R. SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court