The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution for non-prosecution after finding the petitioner had no interest in prosecuting the case.
Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution and connected civil miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
CRP PD No.2490 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011
C.John Kennedy alias Kennedy ... Revision Petitioner
Vs.
C.Ravindran ... Respondent
Prayer : Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India against the order dated 02.06.2011 passed in
I.A.No.1370/2010 in O.S.No. of 2010 ( now numbered as
O.S.No.201 of 2011) by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode.
For Revision Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy
O R D E R
Though the Civil Revision petition has been filed in the year 2011, no notice was served to the respondent. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would submit that there is no instruction from the petitioner. This fact clearly indicates that the revision petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the case.
2
N.SATHISH KUMAR. J., mst
prosecution. The connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.
01.03.2019
mst Index : yes/no Internet : yes/no Speaking order/non-speaking order To The Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode.
CRP PD No.2490 of 2011 and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
3
01.03.2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 that remains unprosecuted due to non-service of notice and lack of instruction from the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C. John Kennedy alias Kennedy
C. Ravindran
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
