Ramuru v. Ayub
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition challenging the rejection of an amendment application. The court held that the relief sought was originally struck off at the time of filing the suit and reintroducing it six years later was barred by limitation.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
CRP(PD).No.1195 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No.6205 of 2018
Ramuru .. Petitioner/Plaintiff
Vs
1.Ayub
2.Senthil Kumar
Document Writer,
Sub-Registrar Office Compound,
Palacode Town,
Dharmapuri District.
3.The Sub-Registrar,
Sub-Registrar Office Compound,
Palacode Town,
Dharmapuri District. ..Respondents/Defendants
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Indian
Constitution against the order dated 07.11.2017 rejecting the unnumbered I.A. of 2017 in O.S.No. 138 of 2011 passed by the District Munsif Court, Palacode.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bhaskar For Respondents : Not ready in notice
2
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an application filed six years after the suit was filed to introduce a relief originally struck off is barred by limitation.
Whether there is any infirmity in the order dismissing the application for amendment of plaint.
Whether the dismissal of the Civil Revision Petition challenging the order is sustainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramuru
- respondent
Ayub
- respondent
Senthil Kumar
- respondent
The Sub-Registrar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court