The Hon'ble High Court dismissed the Common Prayer for two Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel, stating the prayers had become infructuous.
Leave granted to withdraw the Civil Revision Petitions as the prayers sought therein have become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
C.R.P.PD.Nos.1186 & 1187 of 2011 & M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2011
Muthusamy Gounder
Rep by next friend and daughter
V.M.Puspha .... Petitioner in both
C.R.Ps.
Vs
1. Shanmugasundaram (died)
2. S.Bhagyalakshmi
3. S.Jothi Venkatachalam
4. S.Saravana Prakash
5. K.S.Raja Angappa
R2 to R5 are brought on records
as Legal Representatives of the
deceased first respondent, by an
order dated 17.10.2019 passed
by this Court in M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of
2012 in C.R.P.PD.No.1186 of 2011. .... Respondents in
C.R.P.1186 of 2011
Bhagyalakshmi .... Respondent in
C.R.P.1187 of 2011
COMMON PRAYER : Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 05.08.2010 made in I.A.Nos.1072 & 1073 of 2010 in O.S.Nos. 40 & 258 of 2009 respectively, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Palladam.
For Petitioner in both C.R.Ps. : Mr.K.Ramesh Kumar For Mr.P.M.Duraiswamy
2
R.PONGIAPPAN, J.
rts
For Respondents in C.R.P.1186/2011 For R1 : Died For R2 to R5 : Mr.P.Valliappan
For Respondent in C.R.P.1187/2011 : Mr.P.Valliappan
C O M M O N O R D E R
Today when both the petitions are taken up for hearing, the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondents are present.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these petitions by saying that the prayer sough for in these petitions has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, both the Civil Revision Petitions
are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.
17.10.2019 (2/2)
Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order rts
To
The District Munsif Court, Palladam.
C.R.P.PD.Nos.1186 & 1187 of 2011 & M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2011
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muthusamy Gounder Rep by next friend and daughter V.M.Puspha
Shanmugasundaram
S.Bhagyalakshmi
S.Jothi Venkatachalam
S.Saravana Prakash
K.S.Raja Angappa
R.Pongiappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
