Kirupakaran v. Sarojini
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear when the matter was listed for hearing.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
C.R.P.NPD.No.3067 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
J.Kirupakaran .... Petitioner Vs Sarojini .... Respondent
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., to set aside the order and decree dated 21.04.2014 made in I.A.No.104 of 2011 in H.M.O.P.No.14 of 2004 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Nilgiris at Uthagamandalam.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Not ready in notice O R D E R
Challenging the order dated 21.04.2014 made in I.A.No.104 of
2011 in H.M.O.P.No.14 of 2004 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Nilgiris at Uthagamandalam, the petitioner filed this Civil Revision Petition.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC should be allowed despite non-appearance of the petitioner?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
J.Kirupakaran
- respondent
Sarojin
Coram
R.PONGIAPPAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court